x
ddsoon
#
促民众拍照...

槟城14日讯)民众若看到有人把障碍物放置在公用停车格,可拍照并以图片讯息(MMS)传送给市议员。

槟岛市政局执法组将于两星期 后严厉执法,一旦发现民众用障碍物霸占停车格,执法人员可发出罚单,并充公障碍物,最高罚款为500令吉。

由于执法人员必须亲眼见证,或有 照片证明才能给予传票,因此,槟岛执法及公共教育小组交替主席陈翰威及市议员戴良成呼吁民众,若看到有人把障碍物放在停车格上,可将之拍下,并以图片简讯 传给市议员,他们将第一时间处理。

陈翰威和戴良成是于周三上午,带领15位市政局执法人员巡视及教育海墘一带、吉打律、牛奶巷、爱民路的民 众后,向记者如是指出。

陈翰威:2周后严厉执法

陈翰威说,这次巡视的主要目的是教育民众 不要以障碍物霸占停车位,两星期后才会开始严厉执法。

他指出,当局至今已接获10宗来自公众的投诉,因此,在严厉执法之前,该小组成员会派 出1000至2000张传单,教育民众勿将障碍物放在停车格上。

他说,民众或轮胎店、修车店等若有需要,可以写信或到光大15楼泊车小组申 请专用停车位,如果提出的理由合理,申请通常会被通过。

此外,陈翰威也谴责传达错误讯息予租户的屋主,“这些屋主告诉租户只要再多付钱,就 可占用住家门前的公用停车位,其实这是不对的,如果你有合理的理由,可到光大15楼申请将门前的停车格转为专用停车位,他们会以个案处理。”

发 现有人把障碍物放在停车格,霸占车位的民众,可把照片传给陈翰威012-4880409、电邮:kiat@pd.jaring.my;戴良成019-3219392、电邮ls_tay28@yahoo.com

障 碍物无奇不有!

槟岛停车格上障碍物无奇不有!

使用者为占位花样百出,把大竹篮、花盆、铁杆等放在自己门前 的停车格上,剥夺其他驾车人士使用公共停车格的权利。

记者周三随槟岛执法及公共教育小组交替主席陈翰威、市议员戴良成等官员,一同抽样巡视 槟岛公路停车格时,发现停车格上所放的障碍物形形色色,有者更把大型木制垃圾桶放在停车格上,要动用轻型起重机才能将之移起。

槟岛市区停车 格在繁忙时段时常“一格难求”,放置障碍物是常见的占位法,对此,陈翰威表示,该团队将不定时穿着便服突击检查,若发现有人放置障碍物,将给予罚单。

专 车出巡充公障碍物

他指出,除了给罚单的市政局执法人员“便服出巡”,还有以专车出巡的团队,而以专车出巡的团队可直接充 公放在停车格上的障碍物。

“我们有自己的‘出巡表’,会一区区进行突击检查,‘首站’当然就是交通最繁忙的乔治市一带。”

No replies - reply
 
#

槟岛西南区13日讯)国会数据显示1993年至2006年期间,大桥管理公司已赚取了7亿3200万令吉盈利;槟州首席部长林冠英拿出证据,强烈 要求中央政府否决调高过桥费的一概申请。

林冠英指出,根据他在国会获得的数据,1993年到2006年期间,槟城大桥管理公司获得的收入, 包括征收过桥费和政府的赔偿金为17亿令吉,但反观大桥的建筑费与维修费只是9亿6800万令吉而已。

“由此可见,扣除建筑费和维修费后, 管理公司还有7亿3200万令吉的盈余,甚至加上最近大桥加宽工程的费用,管理公司的盈余还是相当可观的。”

“既然如此,大桥管理公司还要 调高过桥费简直是太过份,甚至还有敲诈的成份!”

No replies - reply
 
#
Paul Krugman's View
Tags: paul krugman
 

One on One with Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

SUSIE GHARIB: The big topic at the White House today: jobs and the economy. President Obama met with top congressional lawmakers to talk about ways to stimulate the economy. No official word on proposals that came out of that meeting but the possible options include a tax credit for companies that create new jobs and extending jobless benefits. Earlier this week the Obama administration said it has no plans for a second stimulus package. So what's the solution to getting Americans working and the economy growing again? That's what I asked Paul Krugman today, the Nobel prize winning economist and professor of economics at Princeton.

PAUL KRUGMAN, ECONOMICS PROFESSOR, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: We need lots more -- don't call it stimulus if that's a bad word, but we need lots more government action to create and preserve jobs. Because we stepped back a couple of paces from the edge of the abyss, but that's a long way from having an actual recovery and the job situation still looks dismal for a long ways ahead.

GHARIB: There's some talk in Washington about offering companies that create jobs a tax credit and also extending jobless benefits. Would that do the trick?

KRUGMAN: No, but it would help. I mean extending jobless benefits is absolutely necessary because we're now reaching a point where long-term unemployment is on the rise. We got to have benefits. We can't just let the people fall off the edge and it also puts some purchasing power in the hands of people so at least helps sustain the economy. The job credit is not -- there are a lot of pros and cons but on balance, it's a good thing. If I was up to me I'd probably have a new WPA, but it's not going to happen. So the jobs credit is helpful.

GHARIB: Are you against some kind of second stimulus package is that we just can't afford it. So what's the next best option?

KRUGMAN: That is just not true. It's a deep misunderstanding. First of all, the stimulus package, although it costs money up front, it also helps the economy and so some of the money comes back to you fairly quickly in tax revenues and then it also helps avoid long-term damage to the economy. So really not doing those stimulus packages on an adequate scale, is being penny wise and pound foolish on a grand scale.

GHARIB: So in your view when does the U.S. economy recover?

KRUGMAN: Technically the recession is probably over. GDP is probably growing. Industrial production is growing. So we're no longer in a situation where everything is falling, but gosh, we don't have anything that feels like a recovery until not only jobs start growing, but jobs start growing enough to make a dent in the unemployment rate. And we won't be fully recovered until the unemployment rate is back down to something like 5 percent, which at this point is in the remote missive of the future. We have no idea when that's going to happen.

GHARIB: JPMorgan just came out with a report and they said it's going to take four years for the economy to recover all the jobs that have been lost in this recession. Does that sound about right to you or is that too long?

KRUGMAN: No, that sound about right. I mean this is a financial crisis-led recession. Financial crisis -- recessions are the result of financial crisis are very persistent. Four years is not an unusual number in this case. I mean it took us almost that long to recover all the jobs that were lost in the 2001 recession and that was a much milder affair. So this -- it used to be four years. What I worry about is that we could be looking at a much longer period than that, that we could be looking at a lost decade. That's not my central forecast, but it a real and not negligible possibility.

GHARIB: So are you saying that it's possible that the economy could nose dive from here?

KRUGMAN: No, I don't see a nose dive. But a possibility that the recovery will lose momentum, maybe even a double dip, so we have a second recession, although probably not a severe one. Those are all very real. You try and tell me where a strong recovery will be coming from in the middle of next year. It's very hard to tell that story and it's awfully easy to tell a story where the recovery kind of sputters.

GHARIB: So where do you stand on this whole double dip recession debate?

KRUGMAN: I think it's a little bit less than even odds but it's not that much less. We got an inventory bounce, is a big part of our growth. That will go away. The stimulus will peak early next year. So that will start to fade out. So we have to, if we're not going to have a double dip, something else has to come along and it's not sure that something will.

GHARIB: So if the job situation is going to be bleak for a while, what does that mean about consumer spending?

KRUGMAN: Consumer spending has got almost everything running against it. Half this country is feeling the effects of the joblessness, directly or through people close to them. This is not a small thing. Yes, consumers come roaring back, maybe. There's -- certainly look at individual things. You look at consumer durables and current rates of sale are sort of not replaceable rates. So at some point people start to buy new cars just because their things wear out. But I can't see how a strong consumer recovery is even possible.

GHARIB: If President Obama asks for your advice, what would you tell him is the most important thing he needs to do right now to fix the economy?

KRUGMAN: If I had a single thing that I want most of all it would be a stable state and local governments. That's where we're having a totally gratuitous cutbacks, should not be happening. They're doing double damage. They're both depressing the economy and they're scarring our future because we're losing education. We're losing all these things that are terribly important for people. So I would push for another round of aid to those state and local governments. That would be my top priority.

GHARIB: Professor Krugman, thank you so much for your time, a pleasure talking to you.

KRUGMAN: Thank you.


No replies - reply
 
#
Merry X'mas & Happy New Year!!!
 
Calendar

January 2012
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031

April 2010
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930

November 2009
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930


Older

Recent Visitors

January 24th
google

January 22nd
google

January 17th
google

January 16th
google

January 8th
google

January 2nd
google

December 29th
google

December 22nd
google

December 19th
google

December 16th
google

December 15th
google

December 5th
google